IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Stevens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-06-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 31 4 11 15 0.484 0.1381 0.1391 0.3746 0.3773
2004-05 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 55 8 25 33 0.600 0.1712 0.1649 0.4645 0.4475
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Northland D3 — SR 27 3 0 3 0.111
2007-08 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SR 26 10 21 31 1.192
2006-07 Northland D3 — JR 18 0 1 1 0.056
2006-07 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast JR 26 4 22 26 1.000
2005-06 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SO 21 7 8 15 0.714
2004-05 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast FR 27 9 17 26 0.963
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2004-05 · Southern Maine
+633.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6545
Defenseman overall
#945
Defenseman born in 1985
#879
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nick Neville
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.58 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Nick
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Colford
Saint John's · 2013-14
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Devine
Saint Anselm · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Burnett
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.