IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Bergin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-06-30 Country: Canada
2008 · Round 7, Pick #209  ·  Dallas Stars Dallas Stars
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 10 1 0 1 0.100 0.0217 0.0242 0.0774 0.0862
2005-06 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 48 7 18 25 0.521 0.1130 0.1209 0.4029 0.4309
2006-07 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 53 10 35 45 0.849 0.1842 0.1879 0.6569 0.6701
2007-08 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 45 14 27 41 0.911 0.1976 0.1921 0.7049 0.6853
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 RPI D1 ECAC SR 39 2 8 10 0.256
2010-11 RPI D1 ECAC JR 32 2 16 18 0.562
2009-10 RPI D1 ECAC SO 30 4 7 11 0.367
2008-09 RPI D1 ECAC FR 6 0 1 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2008-09 · RPI
-7.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4373
Defenseman overall
#739
Defenseman born in 1988
#379
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jaden Davis
Aurora · 2023-24
1.031 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
John Williams
Curry · 2006-07
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Frank D'Ancona
Norwich · 2023-24
0.862 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.