IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Fletcher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-01-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Kanata Stallions CCHL 49 13 8 21 0.429 0.0930 0.1022 0.3316 0.3643
2006-07 Kanata Stallions CCHL 53 24 30 54 1.019 0.2210 0.2319 0.7883 0.8272
2007-08 Kanata Stallions CCHL 35 16 19 35 1.000 0.2169 0.2172 0.7737 0.7747
2008-09 Kanata Stallions CCHL 60 41 46 87 1.450 0.3145 0.2965 1.1219 1.0577
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Holy Cross D1 AHA SR 35 10 16 26 0.743
2011-12 Holy Cross D1 AHA JR 26 7 7 14 0.538
2010-11 Holy Cross D1 AHA SO 37 16 22 38 1.027
2009-10 Holy Cross D1 AHA FR 10 0 4 4 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2009-10 · Holy Cross
+76.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9949
Forward overall
#371
Forward born in 1989
#76
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Miller
Adrian · 2005-06
1.679 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Bradshaw
St. Norbert · 2009-10
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Brown
Amherst · 2011-12
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.