IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Véronneau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-12-12 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Leksands IF · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Rockland Nationals CCHL 4 1 2 3 0.750 0.2395 0.2623 0.5806 0.6358
2013-14 Rockland Nationals CCHL 61 41 39 80 1.312 0.4188 0.4378 1.0152 1.0612
2014-15 Rockland Nationals CCHL 27 14 22 36 1.333 0.4257 0.4253 1.0321 1.0311
2020-21 IK Oskarshamn SHL 25 12 6 18 0.720 1.8000 1.8000 — —
2021-22 Leksands IF SHL 51 34 26 60 1.177 2.9413 3.0393 — —
2023-24 Leksands IF SHL 50 17 19 36 0.720 1.8000 1.7013 — —
2024-25 Leksands IF SHL 51 12 16 28 0.549 1.3725 1.2169 — —
2025-26 Leksands IF SHL 40 7 13 20 0.500 1.2500 1.2500 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Princeton D1 ECAC SR 31 13 24 37 1.194
2017-18 Princeton D1 ECAC JR 36 17 38 55 1.528
2016-17 Princeton D1 ECAC SO 33 11 24 35 1.061
2015-16 Princeton D1 ECAC FR 30 11 6 17 0.567
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.37
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2015-16 · Princeton
+53.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#586
Forward overall
#35
Forward born in 1995

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Master
Stevenson · 2017-18
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Krenke
Saint John's · 2021-22
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buster Larsson
Utica · 2017-18
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.