IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Nellis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 58 32 48 80 1.379 0.2992 0.2802 1.0677 0.9998
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SR 38 15 18 33 0.868
2017-18 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA JR 36 12 7 19 0.528
2016-17 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SO 33 9 13 22 0.667
2015-16 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA FR 41 4 13 17 0.415
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2015-16 · Lake Superior State
+72.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7212
Forward overall
#345
Forward born in 1994
#34
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Campion
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2021-22
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Mazur
Endicott · 2018-19
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Besinger
Endicott · 2014-15
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.