IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian Jensen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-01-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 AIK U20 SHL-J20 35 19 20 39 1.114 0.6153 0.6009 1.4873 1.4524
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 RPI D1 — SR 25 1 1 2 0.080
2008-09 RPI D1 — JR 6 1 0 1 0.167
2007-08 RPI D1 — SO 31 2 5 7 0.226
2006-07 RPI D1 — FR 24 1 3 4 0.167
2005-06 Yale D1 ECAC SR 8 2 5 7 0.875
2004-05 Yale D1 ECAC JR 29 11 9 20 0.690
2003-04 Yale D1 ECAC SO 31 11 19 30 0.968
2002-03 Yale D1 ECAC FR 32 10 15 25 0.781
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.56
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2002-03 · Yale
+39.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3702
Forward overall
#120
Forward born in 1983
#58
in SHL-J20

D1 Comparables

Nathan Walker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Marian (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Frank Vatrano
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.61 No data
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Suess
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Toninato
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alex Iafallo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Myles Abbate
Plymouth State · 2018-19
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2001-02
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michel Bond
SUNY Geneseo · 2000-01
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.