← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isak Walther Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-02 Country: Sweden
2019 NHL Draft Round 6, Pick #179  ·  Nashville Predators Nashville Predators
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Södertälje SK U20 SuperElit 5 2 2 4 0.800 0.3134 0.3316 0.9826 1.0397
2019-20 Södertälje SK U20 SuperElit 39 10 6 16 0.410 0.1608 0.1608 0.5040 0.5040
2020-21 Södertälje SK U20 SuperElit 18 8 9 17 0.944 0.3700 0.3700 1.1600 1.1600
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 33 6 11 17 0.515
2023-24 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 24 5 7 12 0.500
2022-23 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 36 9 10 19 0.528
2021-22 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 35 3 5 8 0.229
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2021-22 · Vermont
-19.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8509
Forward overall
#347
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2015-16
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2014-15
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.