IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Barrett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 1 1 2 3 3.000 0.2769 0.3029 0.6870 0.7516
2017-18 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 41 22 29 51 1.244 0.1148 0.1143 0.2849 0.2836
2018-19 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 32 2 5 7 0.219 0.0286 0.0284 0.0743 0.0738
2019-20 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 44 13 11 24 0.545 0.0714 0.0714 0.1851 0.1851
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Misericordia D3 MAC — 18 0 1 1 0.056
2023-24 Wilkes D3 MAC SR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Wilkes D3 MAC JR 7 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Wilkes D3 MAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Wilkes D3 MAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
72%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36020
Forward overall
#1964
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tommy Dougherty
Neumann · 2015-16
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brodie Jamieson
Marian · 2011-12
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Lovick
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.