IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Dougherty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-08-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 41 10 10 20 0.488 0.1047 0.1063 0.2389 0.2425
2016-17 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 46 16 27 43 0.935 0.2006 0.1945 0.4578 0.4439
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Neumann D3 MAC SR 9 0 6 6 0.667
2019-20 Neumann D3 MAC JR 26 8 14 22 0.846
2018-19 Neumann D3 MAC SO 25 5 7 12 0.480
2017-18 Neumann D3 MAC FR 20 1 2 3 0.150
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2017-18 · Neumann
+10.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25837
Forward overall
#1099
Forward born in 1996
#385
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Wright
Bowdoin · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Luca Esposito
SUNY Cortland · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn O'Malley
Aurora · 2017-18
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.