IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isaac Baker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-09-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Cloud USHS-MN 25 1 1 2 0.080 0.0101 0.0101 0.0194 0.0194
2020-21 St. Cloud USHS-MN 15 1 7 8 0.533 0.0675 0.0675 0.1295 0.1295
2021-22 St. Cloud USHS-MN 23 1 8 9 0.391 0.0495 0.0495 0.0950 0.0950
2022-23 Wausau Cyclones NA3HL 44 5 19 24 0.545 0.0695 0.0695 0.1725 0.1725
2023-24 Wausau Cyclones NA3HL 37 6 35 41 1.108 0.1412 0.1344 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 13 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8150
Defenseman overall
#1870
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Mountain
Gustavus Adolphus · 2021-22
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Cooley
Johnson & Wales · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jamie Coffey
St. Scholastica · 2000-01
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.