IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Lovick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-08-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Fresno Monsters NAHL 54 11 20 31 0.574 0.2109 0.2111 0.6060 0.6066
2011-12 Texas Tornado NAHL 59 20 34 54 0.915 0.3363 0.3200 0.9661 0.9194
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SR 26 5 8 13 0.500
2014-15 St. Thomas D3 CCHA JR 24 6 20 26 1.083
2013-14 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SO 28 6 12 18 0.643
2012-13 St. Thomas D3 CCHA FR 8 0 1 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2012-13 · St. Thomas
-47.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15055
Forward overall
#582
Forward born in 1991
#712
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Maxim Maziarchuk
Morrisville · 2023-24
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jarrod Fitzpatrick
Utica · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Trann
St. Norbert · 2000-01
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.