← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrik Satosaari Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-06-18 Country: Finland
Signed Professionally
Pelicans · Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Pelicans U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Pelicans U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 50 1 4 5 0.100 0.0542 0.0542 0.1512 0.1512
2020-21 Pelicans U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 37 6 15 21 0.568 0.3076 0.3076 0.8584 0.8584
2021-22 Pelicans U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 34 12 13 25 0.735 0.3985 0.3719 1.1120 1.0378
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SR 15 1 1 2 0.133
2024-25 Bemidji State D1 CCHA JR 30 3 7 10 0.333
2023-24 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SO 31 1 5 6 0.194
2022-23 Bemidji State D1 CCHA FR 12 0 3 3 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2022-23 · Bemidji State
-28.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3420
Defenseman overall
#800
Defenseman born in 2001
#494
in SM-Liiga-Jr

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2013-14
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2009-10
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.