IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lauri Raiman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-27 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Pelicans U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 42 7 13 20 0.476 0.2581 0.2745 0.7183 0.7641
2022-23 Pelicans U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 37 16 14 30 0.811 0.4395 0.4484 1.2229 1.2478
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA JR 11 2 1 3 0.273
2024-25 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA SO 35 1 4 5 0.143
2023-24 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA FR 32 2 2 4 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2023-24 · Michigan Tech
-61.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11135
Forward overall
#468
Forward born in 2004
#311
in SM-Liiga-Jr

D1 Comparables

Adam Gilmour
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Boston College (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Papa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dave Gust
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zeb Knutson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.82 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tanner Congdon
Bryn Athyn · 2015-16
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Krenke
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jaden Davis
Aurora · 2022-23
1.031 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.