IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Stone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-04-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 32 0 2 2 0.062 0.0369 0.0373 0.1841 0.1861
2004-05 Billings Bulls NAHL 56 2 20 22 0.393 0.1396 0.1358 0.4125 0.4014
2005-06 Billings Bulls NAHL 43 3 8 11 0.256 0.0909 0.0839 0.2686 0.2480
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — SR 14 0 0 0 0.000
2008-09 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — JR 22 0 1 1 0.045
2006-07 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — FR 11 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#16314
Defenseman overall
#1406
Defenseman born in 1985

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cody Doiron
Concordia (WI) · 2012-13
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Heinze
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Nelson
St. Norbert · 2012-13
0.393 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.