IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Kuche Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 — NA3HL 22 9 11 20 0.909 0.2091 0.2091 0.2880 0.2880
2021-22 Gillette Wild NA3HL 29 18 9 27 0.931 0.2141 0.2033 0.2949 0.2801
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 26 2 6 8 0.308
2024-25 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 26 2 6 8 0.308
2023-24 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 26 2 6 8 0.308
2022-23 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 26 2 6 8 0.308
2021-22 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 26 2 6 8 0.308
2020-21 Arizona State ACHA_D1 — — 26 2 6 8 0.308

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26381
Forward overall
#1347
Forward born in 2001
#806
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Stafne
Wisconsin-Stout · 2009-10
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Gardiner
Southern Maine · 2017-18
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Nichols
SUNY Cortland · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.