← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Dube Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NA3HL 8 1 1 2 0.250 0.0314 0.0314 0.0789 0.0789
2021-22 Vermont Academy NE-Prep 26 4 2 6 0.231 0.0457 0.0457 0.1052 0.1052
2022-23 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 29 3 2 5 0.172 0.0398 0.0401 0.0844 0.0851
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 26 2 2 4 0.154
2024-25 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 26 2 2 4 0.154
2023-24 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 26 2 2 4 0.154
2022-23 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 26 2 2 4 0.154
2021-22 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 26 2 2 4 0.154
2020-21 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 26 2 2 4 0.154

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
40%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#54964
Forward overall
#3783
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stevenson · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2017-18
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.