← New Search ↗ Social Card

Seth Beagle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 MJDP USPHL-Premier 42 12 11 23 0.548 0.0716 0.0716 0.1859 0.1859
2021-22 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NA3HL 44 7 4 11 0.250 0.0314 0.0316 0.0789 0.0795
2022-23 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NA3HL 47 8 10 18 0.383 0.0481 0.0463 0.1209 0.1164
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saginaw Valley State University ACHA_D1 30 6 9 15 0.500
2024-25 Saginaw Valley State University ACHA_D1 30 6 9 15 0.500
2023-24 Saginaw Valley State University ACHA_D1 30 6 9 15 0.500
2022-23 Saginaw Valley State University ACHA_D1 30 6 9 15 0.500
2021-22 Saginaw Valley State University ACHA_D1 30 6 9 15 0.500
2020-21 Saginaw Valley State University ACHA_D1 30 6 9 15 0.500

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#46990
Forward overall
#3009
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2009-10
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.