← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drake Adams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New England Wolves |EHLP / Elite| EHLP 36 11 10 21 0.583 0.0669 0.0669 0.1315 0.1315
2021-22 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 23 0 3 3 0.130 0.0164 0.0169 0.0412 0.0424
2022-23 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Premier 22 2 5 7 0.318 0.0416 0.0390 0.1080 0.1012
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 30 9 6 15 0.500
2024-25 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 30 9 6 15 0.500
2023-24 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 30 9 6 15 0.500
2022-23 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 30 9 6 15 0.500
2021-22 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 30 9 6 15 0.500
2020-21 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 30 9 6 15 0.500

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#46643
Forward overall
#3058
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2023-24
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.130 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.