IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Timothy Pickrell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 — NA3HL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0251 0.0264 0.0631 0.0663
2022-23 Mid Cities Jr. Stars NA3HL 46 3 2 5 0.109 0.0136 0.0137 0.0343 0.0345
2023-24 Mid Cities Jr. Stars NA3HL 24 1 0 1 0.042 0.0052 0.0050 0.0132 0.0126
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 — — 30 1 2 3 0.100
2024-25 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 — — 30 1 2 3 0.100
2023-24 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 — — 30 1 2 3 0.100
2022-23 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 — — 30 1 2 3 0.100
2021-22 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 — — 30 1 2 3 0.100
2020-21 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 — — 30 1 2 3 0.100

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#64359
Forward overall
#4585
Forward born in 2003
#5754
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

A.J. Klein
Amherst · 2015-16
0.045 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bo Gronseth
Concordia · 2014-15
0.062 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Anderson
Assumption · 2013-14
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.