← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Doherty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 46 28 34 62 1.348 0.3783 0.3832 1.1100 1.1243
2015-16 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 30 18 25 43 1.433 0.4023 0.3878 1.1805 1.1379
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Penn State D1 BigTen SR 22 8 10 18 0.818
2019-20 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 34 14 23 37 1.088
2018-19 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 36 9 8 17 0.472
2017-18 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 31 11 12 23 0.742
2016-17 Maine D1 HockeyEast 0 0 0 0 0.000
2005-06 Connecticut College D3 SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2004-05 Connecticut College D3 JR 24 0 2 2 0.083
2003-04 Connecticut College D3 SO 24 0 2 2 0.083
2002-03 Connecticut College D3 FR 23 3 1 4 0.174

NCAAe Rankings

#9161
Forward overall
#406
Forward born in 1995
#5
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2021-22
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2014-15
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.