IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Niklas Aaram-Olsen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-04-19 Country: Norway
2026 NHL Draft Eligible  (Intl)
Boston University
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Örebro HK U20 SHL-J20 42 23 18 41 0.976 0.5446 0.5958 1.4068 1.5390
2025-26 Örebro HK U20 SuperElit 29 20 20 40 1.379 0.5310 0.5608 1.7931 1.8936
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#966
Forward overall
#6
Forward born in 2008
#49
in SHL-J20

D1 Comparables

Sean Malone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.87 PPG
→ Harvard (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Gabe Guertler
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.57 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Motte
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Weis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Moore
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Denver (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Boston University Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ethan Phillips
USHL 2018-19
0.61
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Alexander Zetterberg
SuperElit 2023-24
0.33
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Conrad Fondrk
USHL 2024-25
0.32
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Luke Tuch
NTDP-U18 2019-20
0.38
actual FR PPG at Boston University

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Tarantino
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Donny Flynn
Wilkes · 2015-16
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brycon Johnson
Bryn Athyn · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.