← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oscar Holmertz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-03-21 Country: Sweden
2026 NHL Draft Eligible  (Intl)
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Linköping HC U20 SHL-J20 32 10 20 30 0.938 0.5230 0.5701 1.3510 1.4726
2025-26 Linköping HC U20 SuperElit 34 13 23 36 1.059 0.4076 0.4288 1.3764 1.4481
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2443
Forward overall
#30
Forward born in 2008
#163
in SHL-J20

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Penn State (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Average
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Harvard (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Michael's · 2001-02
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tufts · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.