← New Search ↗ Social Card

Douglas Paul Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-07-11 Country: Sweden
2026 NHL Draft Eligible  (Intl)
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Linköping HC U20 SHL-J20 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.2789 0.3083 0.7206 0.7965
2025-26 Linköping HC U20 SuperElit 32 8 17 25 0.781 0.3008 0.3211 1.0156 1.0840
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6132
Forward overall
#88
Forward born in 2008
#518
in SHL-J20

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Harvard (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2015-16
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2018-19
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.