← New Search ↗ Social Card

Egon Ekberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-09-25 Country: Sweden
Top 48 — 2027 NHL Draft Prospect  (Intl)
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Djurgårdens IF U20 SHL-J20 6 3 1 4 0.667 0.3702 0.3983 0.8875 0.9549
2026-27 Djurgårdens IF U20 SHL-J20 10 2 7 9 0.900 0.4998 0.5180 1.1981 1.2417
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1221
Defenseman overall
#48
Defenseman born in 2008
#180
in SHL-J20

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Denver (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Cornell
0.41 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Boston College (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2022-23
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2022-23
1.031 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.