← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Pileggi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-11-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Detroit Fighting Irish USPHL-Premier 42 2 9 11 0.262 0.0343 0.0343 0.0889 0.0889
2020-21 French River Rapids NOJHL 8 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 French River Rapids NOJHL 31 1 9 10 0.323 0.0539 0.0533 0.1343 0.1329
2022-23 French River Rapids NOJHL 26 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 7 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 7 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 7 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 7 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 7 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27248
Defenseman overall
#3929
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tufts · 2016-17
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2003-04
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.