IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Vicario Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 12 0 5 5 0.417 0.1170 0.1208 0.3426 0.3537
2015-16 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier-Classic 28 5 10 15 0.536 0.1504 0.1479 0.4405 0.4332
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SR 24 5 11 16 0.667
2018-19 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC JR 26 7 16 23 0.885
2017-18 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SO 26 12 18 30 1.154
2016-17 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC FR 9 2 1 3 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2016-17 · Fitchburg State
+184.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39340
Forward overall
#1642
Forward born in 1995
#163
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ian Zaleski
Becker · 2018-19
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Parker Williams
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Galan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2004-05
0.839 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.