IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Parker Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-11-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Florida Jr. Blades USPHL-Premier 25 18 9 27 1.080 0.1454 0.1454 0.3676 0.3676
2021-22 Utah Outliers USPHL-Premier 40 18 20 38 0.950 0.1279 0.1225 0.3234 0.3097
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC — 12 3 3 6 0.500
2022-23 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA FR 11 3 2 5 0.455
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2022-23 · Concordia
+376.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30438
Forward overall
#1214
Forward born in 2001
#874
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Garrett Grimstad
Wisconsin-Stout · 2008-09
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Hayward
SUNY Brockport · 2008-09
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mario Tropea
Endicott · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.