IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Galan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-12-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 — BCHL 106 14 24 38 0.358 0.1381 0.1384 0.5217 0.5230
2004-05 — BCHL 37 13 6 19 0.513 0.1979 0.1892 0.7473 0.7143
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SR 25 11 6 17 0.680
2007-08 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC JR 19 10 2 12 0.632
2006-07 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 27 13 17 30 1.111
2005-06 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 31 18 8 26 0.839
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.84
2005-06 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+480.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33817
Forward overall
#970
Forward born in 1984
#1901
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Louis Ouellet
Westfield State · 2023-24
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jory Mullin
Neumann · 2012-13
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Nieuwendyk
SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.