IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Budish Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-11-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 36 4 4 8 0.222 0.0789 0.0790 0.2333 0.2335
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 St. Olaf D3 — SR 25 7 17 24 0.960
2006-07 St. Olaf D3 — JR 26 8 9 17 0.654
2005-06 St. Olaf D3 — SO 17 3 5 8 0.471
2004-05 St. Olaf D3 — FR 25 8 7 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2004-05 · St. Olaf
+787.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#49191
Forward overall
#1370
Forward born in 1984
#5615
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Micky Knox
Wisconsin-Stout · 2009-10
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eddie Effinger
Amherst · 2006-07
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Piegza
Manhattanville · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.