IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quinten Shaffer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Elite 22 11 13 24 1.091 0.1007 0.0978 0.2498 0.2425
2022-23 Columbia Infantry USPHL-Premier 44 18 33 51 1.159 0.1516 0.1464 0.3934 0.3799
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 32 10 9 19 0.594
2024-25 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 32 10 9 19 0.594
2023-24 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 32 10 9 19 0.594
2022-23 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 32 10 9 19 0.594
2021-22 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 32 10 9 19 0.594
2020-21 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 32 10 9 19 0.594

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
8%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15766
Forward overall
#813
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sammy Michaud
University of New England · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew McCann
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett DeLaat
Aurora · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.