← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Martino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Elmira Impact USPHL-Premier 40 5 1 6 0.150 0.0196 0.0218 0.0509 0.0566
2022-23 Elmira Impact USPHL-Premier 37 3 7 10 0.270 0.0354 0.0376 0.0917 0.0975
2023-24 Columbia Infantry USPHL-Premier 37 5 10 15 0.405 0.0530 0.0538 0.1376 0.1396
2024-25 Red River Spartans USPHL-Premier 25 13 17 30 1.200 0.1570 0.1501 0.4073 0.3893
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 31 9 10 19 0.613
2024-25 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 31 9 10 19 0.613
2023-24 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 31 9 10 19 0.613
2022-23 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 31 9 10 19 0.613
2021-22 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 31 9 10 19 0.613
2020-21 Roosevelt University ACHA_D1 31 9 10 19 0.613

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22396
Forward overall
#1231
Forward born in 2004
#1556
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fitchburg State · 2015-16
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2012-13
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.