← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Botzenhart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 WB/Scranton Knights USPHL-Elite 20 2 5 7 0.350 0.0615 0.0619 0.0802 0.0807
2022-23 Buffalo Stampede USPHL-Premier 43 12 10 22 0.512 0.1686 0.1688 0.1740 0.1742
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 24 3 4 7 0.292
2024-25 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 24 3 4 7 0.292
2023-24 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 24 3 4 7 0.292
2022-23 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 24 3 4 7 0.292
2021-22 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 24 3 4 7 0.292
2020-21 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 24 3 4 7 0.292

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
30%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#37913
Forward overall
#2353
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2000-01
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2016-17
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.