← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Hoftiezer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 12 4 1 5 0.417 0.0385 0.0385 0.0954 0.0954
2021-22 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 44 20 35 55 1.250 0.1154 0.1095 0.2863 0.2716
2022-23 Richmond Generals USPHL-Premier 44 13 14 27 0.614 0.0803 0.0758 0.2083 0.1966
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 22 4 8 12 0.545
2024-25 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 22 4 8 12 0.545
2023-24 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 22 4 8 12 0.545
2022-23 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 22 4 8 12 0.545
2021-22 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 22 4 8 12 0.545
2020-21 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 22 4 8 12 0.545

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31844
Forward overall
#1889
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rivier · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2021-22
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.