← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Hellman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-07-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 41 9 16 25 0.610 0.0798 0.0831 0.2070 0.2157
2023-24 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 39 11 22 33 0.846 0.1107 0.1100 0.2872 0.2853
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Grand Valley State University ACHA_D1 32 23 15 38 1.188
2024-25 Grand Valley State University ACHA_D1 32 23 15 38 1.188
2023-24 Grand Valley State University ACHA_D1 32 23 15 38 1.188
2022-23 Grand Valley State University ACHA_D1 32 23 15 38 1.188
2021-22 Grand Valley State University ACHA_D1 32 23 15 38 1.188
2020-21 Grand Valley State University ACHA_D1 32 23 15 38 1.188

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
22%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21854
Forward overall
#1192
Forward born in 2004
#1505
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Western Connecticut · 2022-23
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.