IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Causey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 13 3 6 9 0.692 0.0516 0.0516 0.1586 0.1586
2021-22 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 29 10 13 23 0.793 0.0591 0.0594 0.1817 0.1825
2022-23 Florida Jr. Blades USPHL-Premier 32 3 4 7 0.219 0.0247 0.0247 0.0744 0.0744
2023-24 — EHL 24 0 1 1 0.042 0.0061 0.0060 0.0204 0.0200
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 2 1 1 2 1.000
2024-25 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 2 1 1 2 1.000
2023-24 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 2 1 1 2 1.000
2022-23 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 2 1 1 2 1.000
2021-22 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 2 1 1 2 1.000
2020-21 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 2 1 1 2 1.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#54950
Forward overall
#3800
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zack Taylor
Hamline · 2016-17
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony White
Castleton · 2024-25
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Butzow
Adrian · 2013-14
0.136 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.