← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Beck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-12 Country: Canada
2021 · Round 6, Pick #168  ·  Calgary Flames Calgary Flames
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Ottawa 67's OHL 56 7 12 19 0.339 0.1963 0.1963 0.8718 0.8718
2020-21 Ottawa 67's OHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Ottawa 67's OHL 36 22 22 44 1.222 0.7070 0.6989 3.1404 3.1044
2022-23 Ottawa 67's OHL 45 12 41 53 1.178 0.6814 0.6441 3.0264 2.8607
2023-24 Soo Greyhounds OHL 67 27 58 85 1.269 0.7339 0.6586 3.2599 2.9254
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arizona State D1 NCHC FR 10 5 3 8 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.61
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2025-26 · Arizona State
+31.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2926
Forward overall
#57
Forward born in 2003
#87
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.