IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Beck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-12 Country: Canada
2021 NHL Draft Round 6, Pick #168  ·  Calgary Flames Calgary Flames
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Ottawa 67's OHL 56 7 12 19 0.339 0.1969 0.1969 0.8695 0.8695
2020-21 Ottawa 67's OHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Ottawa 67's OHL 36 22 22 44 1.222 0.7092 0.7011 3.1319 3.0960
2022-23 Ottawa 67's OHL 45 12 41 53 1.178 0.6835 0.6461 3.0181 2.8529
2023-24 Soo Greyhounds OHL 67 27 58 85 1.269 0.7362 0.6607 3.2510 2.9174
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arizona State D1 NCHC FR 10 5 3 8 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.61
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2025-26 · Arizona State
+31.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2870
Forward overall
#57
Forward born in 2003
#92
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Novak
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Vecchione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Landrigan
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joona Juntunen
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.