IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Griffin Sarver Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-06-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 29 0 7 7 0.241 0.0272 0.0269 0.0821 0.0813
2023-24 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 38 0 5 5 0.132 0.0148 0.0139 0.0448 0.0422
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 — — 28 1 4 5 0.179
2024-25 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 — — 28 1 4 5 0.179
2023-24 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 — — 28 1 4 5 0.179
2022-23 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 — — 28 1 4 5 0.179
2021-22 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 — — 28 1 4 5 0.179
2020-21 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 — — 28 1 4 5 0.179

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24402
Defenseman overall
#3858
Defenseman born in 2003
#6349
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeff Burke
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2009-10
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dave Skarbek
UMass Dartmouth · 2015-16
0.105 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Roitman
Concordia · 2021-22
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.