IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Christopoulos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-26 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
St. Francis Xavier Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 North Bay Battalion OHL 57 12 4 16 0.281 0.1624 0.1624 0.7213 0.7213
2020-21 North Bay Battalion OHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 — OHL 68 14 10 24 0.353 0.2042 0.2014 0.9068 0.8943
2022-23 Windsor Spitfires OHL 68 49 25 74 1.088 0.6295 0.5936 2.7961 2.6366
2023-24 Saginaw Spirit OHL 58 30 23 53 0.914 0.5286 0.4731 2.3480 2.1017
2024-25 St. Francis Xavier Univ. USports-M 29 15 17 32 1.103 0.5822 0.6235 3.2341 3.4634
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RIT D1 AHA SO 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4202
Forward overall
#110
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.