← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braden Medved Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 39 0 3 3 0.077 0.0253 0.0261 0.0262 0.0270
2023-24 Columbus Mavericks USPHL-Premier 37 0 5 5 0.135 0.0445 0.0437 0.0460 0.0452
2024-25 Red Bank Generals USPHL-Premier 36 1 4 5 0.139 0.0458 0.0423 0.0473 0.0437
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 24 0 2 2 0.083
2024-25 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 24 0 2 2 0.083
2023-24 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 24 0 2 2 0.083
2022-23 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 24 0 2 2 0.083
2021-22 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 24 0 2 2 0.083
2020-21 Robert Morris ACHA_D1 24 0 2 2 0.083

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27740
Defenseman overall
#4290
Defenseman born in 2004
#6992
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.115 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2022-23
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.