Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Gentry Academy (women) | USHS-MN-W | 22 | 9 | 20 | 29 | 1.318 | 0.1990 | 0.1990 |
| 2021-22 | Gentry Academy (women) | USHS-MN-W | 31 | 12 | 18 | 30 | 0.968 | 0.1461 | 0.1461 |
| 2022-23 | Gentry Academy (women) | USHS-MN-W | 29 | 21 | 28 | 49 | 1.690 | 0.2551 | 0.2551 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | St. Thomas | CHA-W | JR | 36 | 2 | 12 | 14 | 0.389 |
| 2024-25 | Minnesota State | CHA-W | SO | 37 | 1 | 11 | 12 | 0.324 |
| 2023-24 | Minnesota State | CHA-W | FR | 33 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.212 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Marchin | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG | 0.207 | Yale |
| Erin O'Connor | USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.85 PPG | 0.758 | Cornell |
| Lauren Kelly | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG | 0.208 | Dartmouth |
| Anna Wright | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG | 0.000 | Maine |
| Dani Sadek | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG | 0.611 | Ohio State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rylan Kissel | 2024-25 · 1.11 PPG | 0.577 | Bethel | MIAC |
| Jenessa Hernandez | 2014-15 · 1.55 PPG | — | UMass Boston | MASCAC |
| Natalie Simons | 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG | 0.571 | Bethel | MIAC |
| Nikki Logergren | 2011-12 · 1.24 PPG | 0.500 | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
| Lauren Greer | 2007-08 · 1.55 PPG | — | Middlebury | NESCAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.