← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Pusle Dyring-Andersen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-12-30 Country: Sweden
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.23
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2403
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.52
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.5497
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

12%
NCAA D1W
2%
NCAA D3W
85%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2022-23 Newark Ironbound 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 75 14 22 36 0.480 0.1528 0.1528
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Lindenwood WCHA-W JR 33 1 5 6 0.182
2024-25 Stonehill NEWHA SO 32 2 8 10 0.312
2023-24 Stonehill NEWHA FR 38 1 11 12 0.316

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Mekenzie Steffen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG 0.350 Wisconsin
Izzy Bagi 19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG 0.556 Holy Cross
Lauren Boyle USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.08 PPG 0.486 Ohio State
Kate Hallett USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.100 Harvard
Katie Robinson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.129 Minnesota

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Cara Cook 2022-23 · 1.12 PPG 0.333 Aurora NCHA
Amber Meluzio 2024-25 · 0.79 PPG 0.464 Elmira UCHC
Shelby Evans 2024-25 · 0.89 PPG St. Scholastica NCHA
Anya Hafiz 2014-15 · 0.54 PPG 0.684 Saint Mary's (MN) MIAC
Bella Schmidt 2021-22 · 1.27 PPG 0.292 Suffolk NEHC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.