Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Kitchener-Waterloo Jr Rangers | OWHL-U22 | 17 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.294 | 0.1028 | 0.1108 |
| 2023-24 | Waterloo Ravens | OWHL-U22 | 28 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.250 | 0.0874 | 0.0889 |
| 2024-25 | Cambridge Rivulettes | OWHL-U22 | 38 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 0.421 | 0.1472 | 0.1416 |
| 2025-26 | Cambridge Rivulettes | OWHL-U22 | 38 | 7 | 18 | 25 | 0.658 | 0.2300 | 0.2136 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-27 | Syracuse | CHA-W | FR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dani Sadek | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.38 PPG | 0.611 | Ohio State |
| Grace Bizal | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.35 PPG | 0.268 | Boston College |
| Erin O'Connor | USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG | 0.758 | Cornell |
| Lauren Kelly | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG | 0.208 | Dartmouth |
| Taylor Marchin | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG | 0.207 | Yale |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Denchfield | 2017-18 · 1.16 PPG | 0.667 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Amanda Sergent | 2014-15 · 1.16 PPG | 0.667 | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
| Regina Metzler | 2023-24 · 0.77 PPG | 1.000 | Mercyhurst | AHA |
| Julianne Bradford | 2023-24 · 1.54 PPG | 0.500 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Jenna Hoops | 2016-17 · 0.96 PPG | 0.808 | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.