Saint Anselm
Set Commitment
NCAA Division I Women's
Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.04
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0459
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1
NCAA D3W
Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.14
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.1478
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1
D1W / D3W Likelihood
0%
NCAA D1W
8%
NCAA D3W
92%
Club / Other
Based on 40 comparable players
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG
Pre-College Seasons
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Okanagan HA U18 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 29 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.207 | 0.0474 | 0.0459 |
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent · COVID-flagged seasons in yellow
Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ellie Larson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG | 0.143 | RIT |
| Sylvie Wallin | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG | 0.333 | Princeton |
| Kate Glover | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG | 0.167 | Harvard |
| Lauren Niska | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Brinna Dochniak | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG | 0.111 | RIT |
Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelsi Ries | 2022-23 · 0.93 PPG | 0.158 | Augsburg | MIAC |
| Kaitlin Roberts | 2022-23 · 0.38 PPG | — | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Bea Palmer | 2023-24 · 0.56 PPG | 0.250 | Bowdoin | NESCAC |
| Anna Rausch | 2023-24 · 0.48 PPG | 0.312 | St. Norbert | NCHA |
| Paige Friedman | 2024-25 · 0.35 PPG | — | St. Olaf | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.