IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Davis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-11-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2004-05 — USHL 24 3 6 9 0.375 0.2212 0.2190 1.1263 1.1152
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SR 26 7 19 26 1.000
2007-08 St. Thomas D3 CCHA JR 29 10 13 23 0.793
2005-06 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC FR 18 1 2 3 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2005-06 · Minnesota Duluth
-19.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5311
Defenseman overall
#764
Defenseman born in 1985

D1 Comparables

Dakota Mermis
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nelson Armstrong
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Aucoin
Southern Maine · 2023-24
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathan Cook
Babson · 2001-02
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Campion
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2019-20
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.