← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eli Bailey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-07-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Gentry Academy USHS-MN 27 1 3 4 0.148 0.0187 0.0187 0.0360 0.0360
2022-23 Gentry Academy USHS-MN 28 7 21 28 1.000 0.1266 0.1266 0.2429 0.2429
2023-24 Battle Creek Kernels USPHL-Premier 39 2 7 9 0.231 0.0302 0.0300 0.0783 0.0777
2024-25 USPHL-Premier 36 4 4 8 0.222 0.0291 0.0272 0.0754 0.0704
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 25 4 8 12 0.480
2024-25 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 25 4 8 12 0.480
2023-24 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 25 4 8 12 0.480
2022-23 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 25 4 8 12 0.480
2021-22 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 25 4 8 12 0.480
2020-21 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 25 4 8 12 0.480

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11717
Defenseman overall
#2434
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arcadia · 2024-25
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2008-09
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Western Connecticut · 2023-24
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.