IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chad Blanleil Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-06-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 54 1 10 11 0.204 0.0785 0.0807 0.2964 0.3048
2007-08 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 44 3 16 19 0.432 0.1664 0.1621 0.6284 0.6123
2008-09 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 62 6 15 21 0.339 0.1136 0.1062 0.3134 0.2930
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 25 0 2 2 0.080
2011-12 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 19 1 2 3 0.158
2010-11 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 30 1 4 5 0.167
2009-10 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 24 0 5 5 0.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2009-10 · Wisconsin-Superior
+71.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14322
Defenseman overall
#1421
Defenseman born in 1988

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Munroe
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Robinson
Suffolk · 2023-24
0.259 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Roethke
Concordia · 2024-25
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.