IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Donovan McCoy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-10-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Wellington Dukes OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Peterborough Petes OHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Peterborough Petes OHL 61 0 16 16 0.262 0.1517 0.1613 0.6740 0.7168
2022-23 Peterborough Petes OHL 65 2 11 13 0.200 0.1157 0.1180 0.5139 0.5243
2023-24 Sudbury Wolves OHL 67 9 29 38 0.567 0.3281 0.3190 1.4574 1.4172
2024-25 Sudbury Wolves OHL 58 5 22 27 0.466 0.2693 0.2480 1.1961 1.1014
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 33 3 6 9 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2025-26 · Providence
+4.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4431
Defenseman overall
#1136
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gregg Burmaster
Utica · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Grandbois
Worcester State · 2024-25
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Gaffney
Utica · 2008-09
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.