← New Search ↗ Social Card

Donovan McCoy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-10-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Wellington Dukes OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Peterborough Petes OHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Peterborough Petes OHL 61 0 16 16 0.262 0.1522 0.1619 0.6721 0.7148
2022-23 Peterborough Petes OHL 65 2 11 13 0.200 0.1161 0.1185 0.5125 0.5229
2023-24 Sudbury Wolves OHL 67 9 29 38 0.567 0.3291 0.3200 1.4535 1.4134
2024-25 Sudbury Wolves OHL 58 5 22 27 0.466 0.2701 0.2487 1.1928 1.0983
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 33 3 6 9 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2025-26 · Providence
+4.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4241
Defenseman overall
#1117
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2008-09
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2000-01
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2008-09
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.