IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jon Gaffney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-07-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 50 11 12 23 0.460 0.1690 0.1749 0.4855 0.5023
2007-08 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 37 15 14 29 0.784 0.2880 0.2838 0.8273 0.8153
2008-09 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 56 33 34 67 1.196 0.4396 0.4114 1.2628 1.1819
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Utica D3 UCHC SR 26 9 12 21 0.808
2012-13 Utica D3 UCHC JR 28 13 14 27 0.964
2011-12 Utica D3 UCHC SO 25 13 10 23 0.920
2010-11 Utica D3 UCHC FR 25 11 12 23 0.920
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.92
2010-11 · Utica
+198.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11385
Forward overall
#448
Forward born in 1988
#338
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Hatton
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kai Tsoar
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Braydon Beahm
St. Norbert · 2024-25
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.