IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kai Tsoar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Tilton NE-Prep 11 0 2 2 0.182 0.0360 0.0360 0.0828 0.0828
2021-22 Tilton NE-Prep 23 4 1 5 0.217 0.0431 0.0431 0.0990 0.0990
2022-23 Tilton NE-Prep 27 5 7 12 0.444 0.0880 0.0880 0.2025 0.2025
2023-24 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 35 1 5 6 0.171 0.0372 0.0362 0.1326 0.1291
2024-25 — USPHL-Premier 24 27 44 71 2.958 0.3869 0.3591 1.0040 0.9319
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. John Fisher D3 UCHC FR 16 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6044
Forward overall
#181
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ross Enmark
Curry · 2005-06
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Valenti
Utica · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Taurin Haddon-Harris
Curry · 2021-22
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.