← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cédrick Guindon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-21 Country: Canada
2022 NHL Draft Round 4, Pick #127  ·  Montreal Canadiens Montreal Canadiens
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Rockland Nationals CCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Owen Sound Attack OHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Owen Sound Attack OHL 68 30 29 59 0.868 0.5035 0.5236 2.2232 2.3118
2022-23 Owen Sound Attack OHL 68 22 47 69 1.015 0.5888 0.5868 2.6002 2.5914
2023-24 Owen Sound Attack OHL 68 26 31 57 0.838 0.4864 0.4615 2.1479 2.0378
2024-25 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 66 33 52 85 1.288 0.7474 0.6705 3.3002 2.9607
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Vermont D1 HockeyEast 32 3 10 13 0.406
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.55
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2025-26 · Vermont
-25.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3562
Forward overall
#76
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.