← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cédrick Guindon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-21 Country: Canada
2022 · Round 4, Pick #127  ·  Montreal Canadiens Montreal Canadiens
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Rockland Nationals CCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Owen Sound Attack OHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Owen Sound Attack OHL 68 30 29 59 0.868 0.5019 0.5219 2.2293 2.3181
2022-23 Owen Sound Attack OHL 68 22 47 69 1.015 0.5870 0.5850 2.6073 2.5984
2023-24 Owen Sound Attack OHL 68 26 31 57 0.838 0.4849 0.4600 2.1538 2.0434
2024-25 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 66 33 52 85 1.288 0.7451 0.6685 3.3093 2.9689
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Vermont D1 HockeyEast 32 3 10 13 0.406
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.54
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2025-26 · Vermont
-25.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3691
Forward overall
#78
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.